Illegality…

…familiarity breeds contempt.

So goes the saying.

I would have thought there would be much more anger towards the government for allowing one faction -the cell phone industry – to trample all over another faction – television viewers – by imposing new federal regulations for television broadcasting, i.e. the now-offical digital signal.

A big thanks to Washington [offensive link for some] for turning my 15 year old television, which is in perfect working order, into a large paper weight. They owe me the price of my television, adjusted for inflation, on top of all the money that was taken from me to provide converter boxes almost free to the rest of the country.

And no. I’m not going to *buy* a digital converter box. I am highly offended that millions of other people have stolen my money via the government to buy something the government forced on us.

Lord Monckton On Climate Change

Michael Savage has made his interview with Lord Christopher Monckton available.

It was an excellent piece of audio to listen live on the radio the other week and I am please Savage put it up on his website. In related news, England decided Savage is a hate-mongerer and has thus banned him from the privilege of visiting the country.

America Calls the Kettle Black

Newt is dead-on correct in his assessment.

But on the other hand, the U.S. is itself a totally irresponsible Empire run by a person who’s clearly out of touch with reality.

Politically Incorrect

I was quite pleasantly surprised with Liam Neeson’s newest film, Taken, for a few reasons.

Major attention was drawn to the ineptitude of the Bureaucratic form of both national and international governmental structures. Neeson’s character on a few occasions drew serious attention to the inability of those working behind “desks” to understand the true nature of how the world works, including those who formerly worked on the front lines, so-to-speak, of counteracting national and international crime. Such ineptitude not only includes the day-to-day red tape of rules and regulations but also the ease with which governments and their institutions corrupt for the sake of personal profit. Light is shed on, in this instance the sex trade, both alien nationals and domestic citizens turning a blind eye on morality and Just Law [for money].

Justice, then, in this movie’s format comes swiftly and from the hands of just one man. While no one has the right to, in theory, singlehandedly kill perpetrators the underlying principle is still correct: Wrong is wrong, evil is evil and it must be punished and Bureaucracies must stand aside so that one of the purposes of government, to protect its citizens, might function. Needless to say, when government is too corrupt and drunk with its own power, the individual has the right to protect himself and his family.

The sex trade and the basics in how it operates is the other plot driving the film. It is an evil which is global in breadth and needs more attention drawn to it. Barack Giggles Obama would, and is, use/-ing emperor-esque tactics via Executive Order and the so-called Council on Girls and Women to advance reproductive rights [think: entrenching the codification of the legality of abortion], which does nothing but trap girls and women into documented mental torture from murdering unborn children. He instead should be using his platform as the leader of the free world to draw attention to the international sex trade. And this is where the film is unabashedly politically incorrect. Rather than relying upon the government to do what is right, which is impossible on account of its immorality and corrupt nature, the individual is left to stand up for the least of these.

[On a side note, one should come away with the understanding that although women in the Western tradition, and especially in the United States, have the evils of Feminism to thank for their freedom to do, say and dress as they wish, this is still a fallen world ruled in a [now semi-] Patriarchal system. While this in no way implies the objectification of and/or the enslavement of women to whatever degree, I think a return to a form of conservative social behavior is long overdue, where the importance of the health of the family unit is of utmost importance. Since the father is the head of the family he has the responsibility to protect especially his wife and daughters from those seeking to bring harm in whatever form. Travel in both the domestic and international sphere means prudence and wisdom on the part of a woman’s personal actions. I think this is where Muslims have something to teach in the prudence of having a man with a woman when traveling.]

In any case, I would highly recommend seeing this movie, at the matinee price of course since no movie is worth more than that. For fans of intense action and drama, good writing and acting. And the fact that the film requires you to think about actions, consequences and the world at large is another thumbs up.

*New Link*

Scroll down to the bottom of the page and check out The Bailout Game.

Some genius created a game where us common folk can have a small inkling of knowledge on how it feels to deny or hand out billions of fiat dollars to the economy.

The S Word

Here’s a must-read.

Or for those of you too lazy to click on a link and skim through an article, I shall, out of my eternal and most excellent good graces, summarize for you.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Arizona are being investigated by congressional Democrats and allegations by liberal activists that the department has violated the civil rights of illegal aliens.

16,000 inmates [1/3 of all inmates] were determined to be illegal aliens in the Maricopa valley.

The Illegals are being deported after serving their jail time.

The work being done be Arpaio’s detention staff is a likely contributor to the recent reduction in crime in the valley.

Democrat Congressional members are not even trying to hide the motive behind their actions. Which, in this day and age, is a good thing[: we now are finding out on a daily basis who the Patriots are and who the liberal disestablishmentarians are. The latter should be tried on accounts of treason and jailed for life.]

But with national attention on the economy, the issue of illegal immigration which was at the forefront of national scrutiny not more than three years ago has been placed on the back-burner. Yet the situation as seen in the linked article shows the States are obviously still battling the problem. As Michael Savage sums, the national experience is borders, language, culture.

Kudos to those willing to stand up and defend.

With the federal gov’t not only unwilling to defend its borders [and deport illegal immigrants who steal American jobs, steal from the socio-economic well-being of countless American cities and towns and drive up crime rates,] but willing to punish those who are defending the border, I wonder when cries for secession will become audible.

The Constitution, which is essentially a precarious agreement between independent and autonomous States to establish a national gov’t to provide for the common good of all the States and their residents in an unintrusive way, is only a binding document when all constituents agree to uphold it [the States and the thus-effected national gov't]. Since the national gov’t is no longer willing to protect its borders, amongst the myriad of other duties it seems to find irrelevant to uphold, the States are at the least rendered free of all duty towards their Constitutional duties.

It is apparent to me that the best thing for the future of the United States is for the States themselves to enact a three-tier system of correction:

1. Officially secede from the Union.
2. Re-enact the Articles of Confederation. Though things such as a unified currency and provision for the common defense should be tied over from the Constitution.
3. Call a Constitutional Convention.

Over a period not to exceed five or ten years, the Constitution ought to be reinstated with the understanding and implementation of the original intentions of the Founders. Since Republics have a lifespan of only roughly two-hundred years, and since the United States’ Republican experiment ended with the eruption of the Civil War due to the inability to properly address the plight of the black man, we are far overdue in wiping the slate clean and reinstating our Republic.

Jefferson’s words still ring true today:

…[T]o secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Ron Paul’s The Revolution: A Manifesto

[Over the next week or two I am hoping to give some opinion towards Ron Paul's latest book.]

Preface

Dissenters who tell their fellow citizens what is really going on are subject to fear campaigns that, like clockwork, are aimed at the political heretic. Truth is reason in the empire of lies. (x)

The adage that there is a wall of separation between the Church and the State, based upon no evidence other than Jefferson’s non-presidential letter to a Quaker sect, is one of the founding lies of a liberal, Marxist regime, sadly coming from within the political sphere of the U.S, putting domination and centralization of power in the hands of a few Aristocratical elite. Suffice to say such separation is not to be found in the text of the Constitution, but is propagated as existing so as to rather build a wall between modernity and its birthright and inheritance, that is Freedom.

Paul’s aptly named political heretic and empire of lies are nothing more than a repetition of history, having devolved over the centuries from a world of corrupt religion into modernity’s corrupt world without religion; in other words, post-modern secularism and anti-intellectual evangelicalism.

The Newtonian world challenged the authority of the historical Papal regime, specifically in the area of scientific truth, seeking exploration without the hindrance of false Church dogma. Newton, and sadly, other initial Church-deemed heretics, including doctrinal heretics such as Luther and Calvin, did not live to see the truth of Christ fully realized in the context of societal evolution during their lifetime, that you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. (John 8:32)

Fast-forward a few hundred years. The American government (through its indoctrinating establishments of the Marxist media, public education system, etc) has taken the seat as its own secular Papal regime hellbent on propagating falsities to spread its arm of control over the populace. And while today’s political heretic may or may not be God-fearing, no differently under America’s Godless regime do they suffer.

One of the lost methodoligies of the modern American political system is reason, which, as Paul defines, is Truth. We have already lost our Judean-Christian social morality over the past two hundred+ years as a nation which can be argued occurred through societal evolution, the trumping of secularist, atheistic science over the Biblical narrative, etc. And with the expulsion of that morality, our Greek inheritance of reason also made its exit. Without a neo-Rennaissance to rediscover the enlightenment of what reason and truth are for and to all forms of debate, including that of political debate, this age is then to be defined as a reversion to a new Dark Age. I hope there are more Ron Pauls out there who are ready and soon to speak out against the fascist darkening of not only the human mind but the American experience as well, for the pen is mightier than the sword.

Down With Public Libraries

After spending the past few weeks waiting for Ron Paul’s latest book to become available, I’ve recently made two (that’s *dos* for all you illegal Mexicans in the U.S.) trips, one to the Xenia library and another to the Beavercreek facility, to grab the book. I’ve come up empty-handed both times.

I think the illegal and immoral BHO is the man behind this particular curtain. Either that or since China owns so much U.S. debt, they’re calling the shots on how our Internet is run.

If my taxes go to a system that refuses to perform its main function, then my only other choice is to stimulate the local economy and buy my own copy. Which I did.

Dad I’ll loan you the book when I come up to visit next weekend.

Irony In Theory

At least in theory, because he’s a Senator, should Kennedy actually live long enough to see health care nationalized, he’d be refused treatment.

As the argument goes, why keep the old and infirmed alive when, financially, it makes no sense.

Rights of The People

This man is a hero:

“This is my land. I´m the victim here,” Mr. Barnett said. “When someone´s home and loved ones are in jeopardy and the government seemingly can´t do anything about it, I feel justified in taking matters into my own hands. And I always watch my back.”

The judge represents one more liberal using the Constitution as a spittoon:

In March, U.S. District Judge John Roll rejected a motion by Mr. Barnett to have the charges dropped, ruling there was sufficient evidence to allow the matter to be presented to a jury.

As much as we hate lawyers, at least Barnett’s representation has the right argument. How can illegal immigrants have any rights? How are they protected by law when they are breaking the law?

Mr. Barnett’s attorney, David Hardy, had argued that illegal immigrants did not have the same rights as U.S. citizens.

This is not another example where the government can’t do anything. It is another example where the government refuses to do anything. Which means it is another example where the government chooses not to do one of it’s two historical purposes of existing – to protect its citizens from foreign invasion. Is there any question left, then, as to why the Constitutional authors explicitly included in the Constitution that the citizens should have the right to bear arms?

Barnett and this entire matter also shows the historical [European and further back in antiquity] attachment and importance to ownership of land. I think the majority of the modern citizenry have lost the understanding of government, its functions, and their position in ultimately having the power they give government due to the historical trend wherein farmers have left their land and sought factory employment. We still see small vestiges of traditional society every now and then, such as Barnett’s story but it is mostly a lost art. As I’ve said in the past, if ownership of land were required for voting rights, we would see an about-face political turn towards a more traditional society and conservative government.